Faster Rates for Compressed Federated Learning with Client-Variance Reduction

24 Dec 2021  ·  Haoyu Zhao, Konstantin Burlachenko, Zhize Li, Peter Richtárik ·

Due to the communication bottleneck in distributed and federated learning applications, algorithms using communication compression have attracted significant attention and are widely used in practice. Moreover, the huge number, high heterogeneity and limited availability of clients result in high client-variance. This paper addresses these two issues together by proposing compressed and client-variance reduced methods COFIG and FRECON. We prove an $O(\frac{(1+\omega)^{3/2}\sqrt{N}}{S\epsilon^2}+\frac{(1+\omega)N^{2/3}}{S\epsilon^2})$ bound on the number of communication rounds of COFIG in the nonconvex setting, where $N$ is the total number of clients, $S$ is the number of clients participating in each round, $\epsilon$ is the convergence error, and $\omega$ is the variance parameter associated with the compression operator. In case of FRECON, we prove an $O(\frac{(1+\omega)\sqrt{N}}{S\epsilon^2})$ bound on the number of communication rounds. In the convex setting, COFIG converges within $O(\frac{(1+\omega)\sqrt{N}}{S\epsilon})$ communication rounds, which, to the best of our knowledge, is also the first convergence result for compression schemes that do not communicate with all the clients in each round. We stress that neither COFIG nor FRECON needs to communicate with all the clients, and they enjoy the first or faster convergence results for convex and nonconvex federated learning in the regimes considered. Experimental results point to an empirical superiority of COFIG and FRECON over existing baselines.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here