Fundamental Limits of Ridge-Regularized Empirical Risk Minimization in High Dimensions

16 Jun 2020  ·  Hossein Taheri, Ramtin Pedarsani, Christos Thrampoulidis ·

Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) algorithms are widely used in a variety of estimation and prediction tasks in signal-processing and machine learning applications. Despite their popularity, a theory that explains their statistical properties in modern regimes where both the number of measurements and the number of unknown parameters is large is only recently emerging. In this paper, we characterize for the first time the fundamental limits on the statistical accuracy of convex ERM for inference in high-dimensional generalized linear models. For a stylized setting with Gaussian features and problem dimensions that grow large at a proportional rate, we start with sharp performance characterizations and then derive tight lower bounds on the estimation and prediction error that hold over a wide class of loss functions and for any value of the regularization parameter. Our precise analysis has several attributes. First, it leads to a recipe for optimally tuning the loss function and the regularization parameter. Second, it allows to precisely quantify the sub-optimality of popular heuristic choices: for instance, we show that optimally-tuned least-squares is (perhaps surprisingly) approximately optimal for standard logistic data, but the sub-optimality gap grows drastically as the signal strength increases. Third, we use the bounds to precisely assess the merits of ridge-regularization as a function of the over-parameterization ratio. Notably, our bounds are expressed in terms of the Fisher Information of random variables that are simple functions of the data distribution, thus making ties to corresponding bounds in classical statistics.

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now



  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper

  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here