Further results on structured regression for multi-scale networks

2 Sep 2019  ·  Milan Bašić, Branko Arsić, Zoran Obradović ·

Gaussian Conditional Random Fields (GCRF), as a structured regression model, is designed to achieve higher regression accuracy than unstructured predictors at the expense of execution time, taking into account the objects similarities and the outputs of unstructured predictors simultaneously. As most structural models, the GCRF model does not scale well with large networks. One of the approaches consists of performing calculations on factor graphs (if it is possible) rather than on the full graph, which is more computationally efficient. The Kronecker product of the graphs appears to be a natural choice for a graph decomposition. However, this idea is not straightforwardly applicable for GCRF, since characterizing a Laplacian spectrum of the Kronecker product of graphs, which GCRF is based on, from spectra of its factor graphs has remained an open problem. In this paper we apply new estimations for the Laplacian eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and achieve high prediction accuracy of the proposed models, while the computational complexity of the models, compared to the original GCRF model, is improved from $O(n_{1}^{3}n_{2}^{3})$ to $O(n_{1}^{3} + n_{2}^{3})$. Furthermore, we study the GCRF model with a non-Kronecker graph, where the model consists of finding the nearest Kronecker product of graph for an initial graph. Although the proposed models are more complex, they achieve high prediction accuracy too, while the execution time is still much better compare to the original GCRF model. The effectiveness of the proposed models is characterized on three types of random networks where the proposed models were consistently away more accurate than the previously presented GCRF model for multiscale networks [Jesse Glass and Zoran Obradovic. Structured regression on multiscale networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 32(2):23-30, 2017.].

PDF Abstract
No code implementations yet. Submit your code now

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here