Evaluating Visual Properties via Robust HodgeRank

15 Aug 2014  ·  Qianqian Xu, Jiechao Xiong, Xiaochun Cao, Qingming Huang, Yuan YAO ·

Nowadays, how to effectively evaluate visual properties has become a popular topic for fine-grained visual comprehension. In this paper we study the problem of how to estimate such visual properties from a ranking perspective with the help of the annotators from online crowdsourcing platforms... The main challenges of our task are two-fold. On one hand, the annotations often contain contaminated information, where a small fraction of label flips might ruin the global ranking of the whole dataset. On the other hand, considering the large data capacity, the annotations are often far from being complete. What is worse, there might even exist imbalanced annotations where a small subset of samples are frequently annotated. Facing such challenges, we propose a robust ranking framework based on the principle of Hodge decomposition of imbalanced and incomplete ranking data. According to the HodgeRank theory, we find that the major source of the contamination comes from the cyclic ranking component of the Hodge decomposition. This leads us to an outlier detection formulation as sparse approximations of the cyclic ranking projection. Taking a step further, it facilitates a novel outlier detection model as Huber's LASSO in robust statistics. Moreover, simple yet scalable algorithms are developed based on Linearized Bregman Iteration to achieve an even less biased estimator. Statistical consistency of outlier detection is established in both cases under nearly the same conditions. Our studies are supported by experiments with both simulated examples and real-world data. The proposed framework provides us a promising tool for robust ranking with large scale crowdsourcing data arising from computer vision. read more

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here