Semantic Similarity Measure of Natural Language Text through Machine Learning and a Keyword-Aware Cross-Encoder-Ranking Summarizer -- A Case Study Using UCGIS GIS&T Body of Knowledge

17 May 2023  ·  Yuanyuan Tian, Wenwen Li, Sizhe Wang, Zhining Gu ·

Initiated by the University Consortium of Geographic Information Science (UCGIS), GIS&T Body of Knowledge (BoK) is a community-driven endeavor to define, develop, and document geospatial topics related to geographic information science and technologies (GIS&T). In recent years, GIS&T BoK has undergone rigorous development in terms of its topic re-organization and content updating, resulting in a new digital version of the project. While the BoK topics provide useful materials for researchers and students to learn about GIS, the semantic relationships among the topics, such as semantic similarity, should also be identified so that a better and automated topic navigation can be achieved. Currently, the related topics are either defined manually by editors or authors, which may result in an incomplete assessment of topic relationship. To address this challenge, our research evaluates the effectiveness of multiple natural language processing (NLP) techniques in extracting semantics from text, including both deep neural networks and traditional machine learning approaches. Besides, a novel text summarization - KACERS (Keyword-Aware Cross-Encoder-Ranking Summarizer) - is proposed to generate a semantic summary of scientific publications. By identifying the semantic linkages among key topics, this work provides guidance for future development and content organization of the GIS&T BoK project. It also offers a new perspective on the use of machine learning techniques for analyzing scientific publications, and demonstrate the potential of KACERS summarizer in semantic understanding of long text documents.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here