Abstract Argumentation
4 papers with code • 0 benchmarks • 0 datasets
Identifying argumentative statements from natural language dialogs.
Benchmarks
These leaderboards are used to track progress in Abstract Argumentation
Latest papers with no code
An Extension-based Approach for Computing and Verifying Preferences in Abstract Argumentation
Our research considers the inverse of the standard reasoning problem, i. e., given an abstract argumentation framework and a set of justified arguments, we compute what the possible preferences over arguments are.
Defense semantics of argumentation: revisit
In this paper we introduce a novel semantics, called defense semantics, for Dung's abstract argumentation frameworks in terms of a notion of (partial) defence, which is a triple encoding that one argument is (partially) defended by another argument via attacking the attacker of the first argument.
Technical Report on the Learning of Case Relevance in Case-Based Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation
Specifically, we show that, for two legal datasets, AA-CBR and decision-tree-based learning of case relevance perform competitively in comparison with decision trees.
Semi-Abstract Value-Based Argumentation Framework
The contribution of this thesis is two-fold.
Understanding ProbLog as Probabilistic Argumentation
ProbLog is a popular probabilistic logic programming language/tool, widely used for applications requiring to deal with inherent uncertainties in structured domains.
Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation (full version)
In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-based semantics, where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics, where grades of acceptability are assigned to arguments.
A novel structured argumentation framework for improved explainability of classification tasks
The study presents a methodology for construction of $xADGs$ and evaluates their size and predictive capacity for classification tasks of varying magnitudes.
An Interleaving Semantics of the Timed Concurrent Language for Argumentation to Model Debates and Dialogue Games
To demonstrate the capabilities of language, we also show how it can be used to model interactions such as debates and dialogue games taking place between intelligent agents.
Non-flat ABA is an Instance of Bipolar Argumentation
Assumption-based Argumentation (ABA) is a well-known structured argumentation formalism, whereby arguments and attacks between them are drawn from rules, defeasible assumptions and their contraries.
Integrating Temporality and Causality into Acyclic Argumentation Frameworks using a Transition System
In the context of abstract argumentation, we present the benefits of considering temporality, i. e. the order in which arguments are enunciated, as well as causality.
