no code implementations • 11 Jul 2023 • Cecilia Di Florio, Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor
This paper examines how a notion of stable explanation developed elsewhere in Defeasible Logic can be expressed in the context of formal argumentation.
no code implementations • 20 Oct 2022 • Xinghan Liu, Emiliano Lorini, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor
In this paper we combine the modal logic approach (binary-input classifier, BLC) to classifiers and their explanations given by Liu & Lorini (2021) with Horty's account of factor-based CBR, since both a classifier and CBR map sets of features to decisions or classifications.
no code implementations • 23 Sep 2022 • Francesco Olivieri, Guido Governatori, Matteo Cristani, Antonino Rotolo, Abdul Sattar
First, we introduce and formalise two variants of Defeasible Deontic Logic with Meta-Rules to represent (1) defeasible meta-theories with deontic modalities, and (2) two different types of conflicts among rules: Simple Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic, and Cautious Conflict Defeasible Deontic Logic.
no code implementations • 9 Sep 2022 • Guido Governatori, Silvano Colombo Tosatto, Antonino Rotolo
This paper presents an extension of Defeasible Deontic Logic to deal with the Pragmatic Oddity problem.
no code implementations • 19 May 2019 • Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo
In this paper, we explore how, and if, free choice permission (FCP) can be accepted when we consider deontic conflicts between certain types of permissions and obligations.
no code implementations • 5 Mar 2019 • Maximiliano C. D. Budán, María Laura Cobo, Diego I. Martínez, Antonino Rotolo
In this work, we enrich a formalism for argumentation by including a formal characterization of features related to the knowledge, in order to capture proper reasoning in legal domains.
no code implementations • 1 Aug 2017 • Regis Riveret, Pietro Baroni, Yang Gao, Guido Governatori, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor
The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities.
1 code implementation • 13 Dec 2015 • Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri, Simone Scannapieco, Antonino Rotolo, Matteo Cristani
The paper proposes a fresh look at the concept of goal and advances that motivational attitudes like desire, goal and intention are just facets of the broader notion of (acceptable) outcome.
no code implementations • 16 Dec 2013 • Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri, Simone Scannapieco, Antonino Rotolo, Matteo Cristani
In this paper we study the complexity of strategic argumentation for dialogue games.