no code implementations • LREC 2022 • Marcello Gecchele, Hiroaki Yamada, Takenobu Tokunaga, Yasuyo Sawaki, Mika Ishizuka
The algorithm was tested over the L2WS 2021 corpus.
no code implementations • LREC 2022 • Hiroaki Yamada, Takenobu Tokunaga, Ryutaro Ohara, Keisuke Takeshita, Mihoko Sumida
Moreover, the scheme can capture the explicit causal relation between judge’s decisions and their corresponding rationales, allowing multiple decisions in a document.
no code implementations • 26 Mar 2024 • Ha-Thanh Nguyen, Hiroaki Yamada, Ken Satoh
In this paper, we explore the application of Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs) in cross-lingual legal Question-Answering (QA) systems using the COLIEE Task 4 dataset.
no code implementations • 1 Dec 2023 • Hiroaki Yamada, Takenobu Tokunaga, Ryutaro Ohara, Akira Tokutsu, Keisuke Takeshita, Mihoko Sumida
This paper presents the first dataset for Japanese Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP), the Japanese Tort-case Dataset (JTD), which features two tasks: tort prediction and its rationale extraction.
no code implementations • NeurIPS 2021 • Hiroaki Yamada, Makoto Yamada
A recently introduced technique for a sparse optimization problem called "safe screening" allows us to identify irrelevant variables in the early stage of optimization.
no code implementations • WS 2019 • Marcello Gecchele, Hiroaki Yamada, Takenobu Tokunaga, Yasuyo Sawaki
We im-plemented the proposed method in a GUI tool{``}Segment Matcher{''} that aids teachers to estab-lish a link between corresponding IUs acrossthe summary and source text.
no code implementations • WS 2017 • Hiroaki Yamada, Simone Teufel, Takenobu Tokunaga
In particular, we utilize the hierarchical argument structure of the judgment documents.