Search Results for author:
Found 7 papers, 0 papers with code
Admissibility in Strength-based Argumentation: Complexity and Algorithms (Extended Version with Proofs)
In this paper, we push forward the study and investigate the adaptation of admissibility-based semantics.
Design and Results of ICCMA 2021
This paper discusses the design of the Fourth International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation.
Stability in Abstract Argumentation
The notion of stability in a structured argumentation setup characterizes situations where the acceptance status associated with a given literal will not be impacted by any future evolution of this setup.
Possible Controllability of Control Argumentation Frameworks -- Extended Version
The recent Control Argumentation Framework (CAF) is a generalization of Dung's Argumentation Framework which handles argumentation dynamics under uncertainty; especially it can be used to model the behavior of an agent which can anticipate future changes in the environment.
A Note on Rich Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks
Recently, qualitative uncertainty in abstract argumentation has received much attention.
Distributing Knowledge into Simple Bases
In other words, we are interested in seeing if $K$ can be distributed into knowledge bases of simpler structure, such that the task of merging allows for a reconstruction of the original knowledge.
Using Enthymemes to Fill the Gap between Logical Argumentation and Revision of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Our idea is that, even when arguments and attacks are defined by means of a logical belief base, there may be some uncertainty about how accurate is the content of an argument, and so the presence (or absence) of attacks concerning it.
