The RefCOCO dataset is a referring expression generation (REG) dataset used for tasks related to understanding natural language expressions that refer to specific objects in images. Here are the key details about RefCOCO:
302 PAPERS • 19 BENCHMARKS
SHAPES is a dataset of synthetic images designed to benchmark systems for understanding of spatial and logical relations among multiple objects. The dataset consists of complex questions about arrangements of colored shapes. The questions are built around compositions of concepts and relations, e.g. Is there a red shape above a circle? or Is a red shape blue?. Questions contain between two and four attributes, object types, or relationships. There are 244 questions and 15,616 images in total, with all questions having a yes and no answer (and corresponding supporting image). This eliminates the risk of learning biases.
112 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
Visual Entailment (VE) consists of image-sentence pairs whereby a premise is defined by an image, rather than a natural language sentence as in traditional Textual Entailment tasks. The goal of a trained VE model is to predict whether the image semantically entails the text. SNLI-VE is a dataset for VE which is based on the Stanford Natural Language Inference corpus and Flickr30k dataset.
109 PAPERS • 2 BENCHMARKS
RAVEN consists of 1,120,000 images and 70,000 RPM (Raven's Progressive Matrices) problems, equally distributed in 7 distinct figure configurations.
80 PAPERS • NO BENCHMARKS YET
NLVR contains 92,244 pairs of human-written English sentences grounded in synthetic images. Because the images are synthetically generated, this dataset can be used for semantic parsing.
76 PAPERS • 3 BENCHMARKS
Contains 145k captions for 28k images. The dataset challenges a model to recognize text, relate it to its visual context, and decide what part of the text to copy or paraphrase, requiring spatial, semantic, and visual reasoning between multiple text tokens and visual entities, such as objects.
64 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
Winoground is a dataset for evaluating the ability of vision and language models to conduct visio-linguistic compositional reasoning. Given two images and two captions, the goal is to match them correctly -- but crucially, both captions contain a completely identical set of words, only in a different order. The dataset was carefully hand-curated by expert annotators and is labeled with a rich set of fine-grained tags to assist in analyzing model performance.
59 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
The Visual Spatial Reasoning (VSR) corpus is a collection of caption-image pairs with true/false labels. Each caption describes the spatial relation of two individual objects in the image, and a vision-language model (VLM) needs to judge whether the caption is correctly describing the image (True) or not (False).
41 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
FigureQA is a visual reasoning corpus of over one million question-answer pairs grounded in over 100,000 images. The images are synthetic, scientific-style figures from five classes: line plots, dot-line plots, vertical and horizontal bar graphs, and pie charts.
38 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
MathVista is a consolidated Mathematical reasoning benchmark within Visual contexts. It consists of three newly created datasets, IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA, which address the missing visual domains and are tailored to evaluate logical reasoning on puzzle test figures, algebraic reasoning over functional plots, and scientific reasoning with academic paper figures, respectively. It also incorporates 9 MathQA datasets and 19 VQA datasets from the literature, which significantly enrich the diversity and complexity of visual perception and mathematical reasoning challenges within our benchmark. In total, MathVista includes 6,141 examples collected from 31 different datasets.
27 PAPERS • NO BENCHMARKS YET
Current visual question answering (VQA) tasks mainly consider answering human-annotated questions for natural images in the daily-life context. Icon question answering (IconQA) is a benchmark which aims to highlight the importance of abstract diagram understanding and comprehensive cognitive reasoning in real-world diagram word problems. For this benchmark, a large-scale IconQA dataset is built that consists of three sub-tasks: multi-image-choice, multi-text-choice, and filling-in-the-blank. Compared to existing VQA benchmarks, IconQA requires not only perception skills like object recognition and text understanding, but also diverse cognitive reasoning skills, such as geometric reasoning, commonsense reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning.
23 PAPERS • 1 BENCHMARK
The Image-Grounded Language Understanding Evaluation (IGLUE) benchmark brings together—by both aggregating pre-existing datasets and creating new ones—visual question answering, cross-modal retrieval, grounded reasoning, and grounded entailment tasks across 20 diverse languages. The benchmark enables the evaluation of multilingual multimodal models for transfer learning, not only in a zero-shot setting, but also in newly defined few-shot learning setups.
21 PAPERS • 13 BENCHMARKS
Multicultural Reasoning over Vision and Language (MaRVL) is a dataset based on an ImageNet-style hierarchy representative of many languages and cultures (Indonesian, Mandarin Chinese, Swahili, Tamil, and Turkish). The selection of both concepts and images is entirely driven by native speakers. Afterwards, we elicit statements from native speakers about pairs of images. The task consists in discriminating whether each grounded statement is true or false.
18 PAPERS • 3 BENCHMARKS
CLEVR-Ref+ is a synthetic diagnostic dataset for referring expression comprehension. The precise locations and attributes of the objects are readily available, and the referring expressions are automatically associated with functional programs. The synthetic nature allows control over dataset bias (through sampling strategy), and the modular programs enable intermediate reasoning ground truth without human annotators.
16 PAPERS • 2 BENCHMARKS
This dataset is collected via the WinoGAViL game to collect challenging vision-and-language associations. Inspired by the popular card game Codenames, a “spymaster” gives a textual cue related to several visual candidates, and another player has to identify them.
4 PAPERS • 2 BENCHMARKS
ADE-Affordance is a new dataset that builds upon ADE20k, which contains annotations enabling such rich visual reasoning.
3 PAPERS • NO BENCHMARKS YET
General-purpose Visual Understanding Evaluation (G-VUE) is a comprehensive benchmark covering the full spectrum of visual cognitive abilities with four functional domains -- Perceive, Ground, Reason, and Act. The four domains are embodied in 11 carefully curated tasks, from 3D reconstruction to visual reasoning and manipulation.
2 PAPERS • NO BENCHMARKS YET
The IRFL dataset consists of idioms, similes, and metaphors with matching figurative and literal images, as well as two novel tasks of multimodal figurative understanding and preference.
2 PAPERS • 2 BENCHMARKS
Recent times have witnessed an increasing number of applications of deep neural networks towards solving tasks that require superior cognitive abilities, e.g., playing Go, generating art, ChatGPT, etc. Such a dramatic progress raises the question: how generalizable are neural networks in solving problems that demand broad skills? To answer this question, we propose SMART: a Simple Multimodal Algorithmic Reasoning Task (and the associated SMART-101 dataset) for evaluating the abstraction, deduction, and generalization abilities of neural networks in solving visuo-linguistic puzzles designed specifically for children of younger age (6--8). Our dataset consists of 101 unique puzzles; each puzzle comprises a picture and a question, and their solution needs a mix of several elementary skills, including pattern recognition, algebra, and spatial reasoning, among others. To train deep neural networks, we programmatically augment each puzzle to 2,000 new instances; each instance varied in appea
Bongard-OpenWorld is a new benchmark for evaluating real-world few-shot reasoning for machine vision. We hope it can help us better understand the limitations of current visual intelligence and facilitate future research on visual agents with stronger few-shot visual reasoning capabilities.
1 PAPER • 1 BENCHMARK