FILM: Frame Interpolation for Large Motion

10 Feb 2022  ·  Fitsum Reda, Janne Kontkanen, Eric Tabellion, Deqing Sun, Caroline Pantofaru, Brian Curless ·

We present a frame interpolation algorithm that synthesizes multiple intermediate frames from two input images with large in-between motion. Recent methods use multiple networks to estimate optical flow or depth and a separate network dedicated to frame synthesis. This is often complex and requires scarce optical flow or depth ground-truth. In this work, we present a single unified network, distinguished by a multi-scale feature extractor that shares weights at all scales, and is trainable from frames alone. To synthesize crisp and pleasing frames, we propose to optimize our network with the Gram matrix loss that measures the correlation difference between feature maps. Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the Xiph large motion benchmark. We also achieve higher scores on Vimeo-90K, Middlebury and UCF101, when comparing to methods that use perceptual losses. We study the effect of weight sharing and of training with datasets of increasing motion range. Finally, we demonstrate our model's effectiveness in synthesizing high quality and temporally coherent videos on a challenging near-duplicate photos dataset. Codes and pre-trained models are available at https://film-net.github.io.

PDF Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Video Frame Interpolation Middlebury FILM SSIM 0.966 # 2
PSNR 37.52 # 3
Video Frame Interpolation MSU Video Frame Interpolation FILM PSNR 28.11 # 7
SSIM 0.928 # 5
VMAF 68.68 # 6
LPIPS 0.033 # 7
MS-SSIM 0.948 # 7
Video Frame Interpolation UCF101 FILM PSNR 35.32 # 11
SSIM 0.952 # 13
Video Frame Interpolation Vimeo90K FILM PSNR 36.06 # 9
SSIM 0.97 # 15
Video Frame Interpolation Xiph-2K FILM PSNR 36.66 # 2
SSIM 0.951 # 2
Video Frame Interpolation Xiph-4k FILM PSNR 33.78 # 2
SSIM 0.906 # 2

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here