In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning

The recent research in semi-supervised learning (SSL) is mostly dominated by consistency regularization based methods which achieve strong performance. However, they heavily rely on domain-specific data augmentations, which are not easy to generate for all data modalities. Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models; these predictions generate many incorrect pseudo-labels, leading to noisy training. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process. Furthermore, UPS generalizes the pseudo-labeling process, allowing for the creation of negative pseudo-labels; these negative pseudo-labels can be used for multi-label classification as well as negative learning to improve the single-label classification. We achieve strong performance when compared to recent SSL methods on the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets. Also, we demonstrate the versatility of our method on the video dataset UCF-101 and the multi-label dataset Pascal VOC.

PDF Abstract ICLR 2021 PDF ICLR 2021 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Benchmark
Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification Chest X-Ray14 2% labeled UPS AUC 65.51 # 3
Semi-Supervised Image Classification cifar-100, 10000 Labels UPS (CNN-13) Percentage error 32 # 22
Semi-Supervised Image Classification CIFAR-100, 4000 Labels UPS (CNN-13) Accuracy 59.23 # 1
Semi-Supervised Image Classification CIFAR-10, 1000 Labels UPS (CNN-13) Accuracy 91.82 # 2
Semi-Supervised Image Classification CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels UPS (CNN-13) Percentage error 6.39±0.02 # 29
Semi-Supervised Image Classification CIFAR-10, 4000 Labels UPS (Shake-Shake) Percentage error 4.86 # 17

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here