Is Attention Better Than Matrix Decomposition?

As an essential ingredient of modern deep learning, attention mechanism, especially self-attention, plays a vital role in the global correlation discovery. However, is hand-crafted attention irreplaceable when modeling the global context? Our intriguing finding is that self-attention is not better than the matrix decomposition (MD) model developed 20 years ago regarding the performance and computational cost for encoding the long-distance dependencies. We model the global context issue as a low-rank recovery problem and show that its optimization algorithms can help design global information blocks. This paper then proposes a series of Hamburgers, in which we employ the optimization algorithms for solving MDs to factorize the input representations into sub-matrices and reconstruct a low-rank embedding. Hamburgers with different MDs can perform favorably against the popular global context module self-attention when carefully coping with gradients back-propagated through MDs. Comprehensive experiments are conducted in the vision tasks where it is crucial to learn the global context, including semantic segmentation and image generation, demonstrating significant improvements over self-attention and its variants.

PDF Abstract ICLR 2021 PDF ICLR 2021 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K Light-Ham (VAN-Large) Validation mIoU 51.0 # 96
Params (M) 45.6 # 51
GFLOPs (512 x 512) 55.0 # 5
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K Light-Ham (VAN-Small, D=256) Validation mIoU 45.2 # 187
Params (M) 13.8 # 58
GFLOPs (512 x 512) 15.8 # 2
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K Light-Ham (VAN-Base) Validation mIoU 49.6 # 122
Params (M) 27.4 # 54
GFLOPs (512 x 512) 34.4 # 4
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K Light-Ham (VAN-Huge) Validation mIoU 51.5 # 88
Params (M) 61.1 # 40
GFLOPs (512 x 512) 71.8 # 7
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K HamNet (ResNet-101) Validation mIoU 46.8 # 162
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K val Light-Ham (VAN-Large, 46M, IN-1k, MS) mIoU 51.0 # 44
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K val Light-Ham (VAN-Base, 27M, IN-1k, MS) mIoU 49.6 # 53
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K val Light-Ham (VAN-Huge, 61M, IN-1k, MS) mIoU 51.5 # 41
Conditional Image Generation ImageNet 128x128 HamGAN FID 14.80 # 18
Inception score 58.75 # 14
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL Context HamNet (ResNet-101) mIoU 55.2 # 28
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL VOC 2012 test HamNet w/o COCO (ResNet-101) Mean IoU 85.9% # 7

Methods