LLM Cognitive Judgements Differ From Human
Large Language Models (LLMs) have lately been on the spotlight of researchers, businesses, and consumers alike. While the linguistic capabilities of such models have been studied extensively, there is growing interest in investigating them as cognitive subjects. In the present work I examine GPT-3 and ChatGPT capabilities on an limited-data inductive reasoning task from the cognitive science literature. The results suggest that these models' cognitive judgements are not human-like.
PDF AbstractTasks
Datasets
Add Datasets
introduced or used in this paper
Results from the Paper
Submit
results from this paper
to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the
community compare results to other papers.
Methods
Adam •
Attention Dropout •
BPE •
Cosine Annealing •
Dense Connections •
Dropout •
Fixed Factorized Attention •
GELU •
GPT-3 •
Layer Normalization •
Linear Layer •
Linear Warmup With Cosine Annealing •
Multi-Head Attention •
Residual Connection •
Scaled Dot-Product Attention •
Softmax •
Strided Attention •
Weight Decay
