N2D: (Not Too) Deep Clustering via Clustering the Local Manifold of an Autoencoded Embedding

16 Aug 2019  ·  Ryan McConville, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Robert J. Piechocki, Ian Craddock ·

Deep clustering has increasingly been demonstrating superiority over conventional shallow clustering algorithms. Deep clustering algorithms usually combine representation learning with deep neural networks to achieve this performance, typically optimizing a clustering and non-clustering loss... In such cases, an autoencoder is typically connected with a clustering network, and the final clustering is jointly learned by both the autoencoder and clustering network. Instead, we propose to learn an autoencoded embedding and then search this further for the underlying manifold. For simplicity, we then cluster this with a shallow clustering algorithm, rather than a deeper network. We study a number of local and global manifold learning methods on both the raw data and autoencoded embedding, concluding that UMAP in our framework is best able to find the most clusterable manifold in the embedding, suggesting local manifold learning on an autoencoded embedding is effective for discovering higher quality discovering clusters. We quantitatively show across a range of image and time-series datasets that our method has competitive performance against the latest deep clustering algorithms, including out-performing current state-of-the-art on several. We postulate that these results show a promising research direction for deep clustering. The code can be found at https://github.com/rymc/n2d read more

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Image Clustering Fashion-MNIST N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.672 # 2
NMI 0.684 # 2
Image Clustering HAR N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.801 # 1
NMI 0.683 # 1
Image Clustering MNIST-full N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.942 # 3
Accuracy 0.979 # 3
Image Clustering MNIST-test N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.882 # 9
Accuracy 0.948 # 7
Image Clustering pendigits N2D (UMAP) Accuracy 0.885 # 1
NMI 0.863 # 1
Image Clustering USPS N2D (UMAP) NMI 0.901 # 9
Accuracy 0.958 # 7

Methods