PESTS: Persian_English Cross Lingual Corpus for Semantic Textual Similarity

13 May 2023  ·  Mohammad Abdous, Poorya Piroozfar, Behrouz Minaei Bidgoli ·

One of the components of natural language processing that has received a lot of investigation recently is semantic textual similarity. In computational linguistics and natural language processing, assessing the semantic similarity of words, phrases, paragraphs, and texts is crucial. Calculating the degree of semantic resemblance between two textual pieces, paragraphs, or phrases provided in both monolingual and cross-lingual versions is known as semantic similarity. Cross lingual semantic similarity requires corpora in which there are sentence pairs in both the source and target languages with a degree of semantic similarity between them. Many existing cross lingual semantic similarity models use a machine translation due to the unavailability of cross lingual semantic similarity dataset, which the propagation of the machine translation error reduces the accuracy of the model. On the other hand, when we want to use semantic similarity features for machine translation the same machine translations should not be used for semantic similarity. For Persian, which is one of the low resource languages, no effort has been made in this regard and the need for a model that can understand the context of two languages is felt more than ever. In this article, the corpus of semantic textual similarity between sentences in Persian and English languages has been produced for the first time by using linguistic experts. We named this dataset PESTS (Persian English Semantic Textual Similarity). This corpus contains 5375 sentence pairs. Also, different models based on transformers have been fine-tuned using this dataset. The results show that using the PESTS dataset, the Pearson correlation of the XLM ROBERTa model increases from 85.87% to 95.62%.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods