Template based Graph Neural Network with Optimal Transport Distances

31 May 2022  ยท  Cรฉdric Vincent-Cuaz, Rรฉmi Flamary, Marco Corneli, Titouan Vayer, Nicolas Courty ยท

Current Graph Neural Networks (GNN) architectures generally rely on two important components: node features embedding through message passing, and aggregation with a specialized form of pooling. The structural (or topological) information is implicitly taken into account in these two steps. We propose in this work a novel point of view, which places distances to some learnable graph templates at the core of the graph representation. This distance embedding is constructed thanks to an optimal transport distance: the Fused Gromov-Wasserstein (FGW) distance, which encodes simultaneously feature and structure dissimilarities by solving a soft graph-matching problem. We postulate that the vector of FGW distances to a set of template graphs has a strong discriminative power, which is then fed to a non-linear classifier for final predictions. Distance embedding can be seen as a new layer, and can leverage on existing message passing techniques to promote sensible feature representations. Interestingly enough, in our work the optimal set of template graphs is also learnt in an end-to-end fashion by differentiating through this layer. After describing the corresponding learning procedure, we empirically validate our claim on several synthetic and real life graph classification datasets, where our method is competitive or surpasses kernel and GNN state-of-the-art approaches. We complete our experiments by an ablation study and a sensitivity analysis to parameters.

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Result Benchmark
Graph Classification COLLAB TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 84.3% # 2
Graph Classification ENZYMES TFGW SP (L=2) Accuracy 75.1 # 2
Graph Classification IMDb-B TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 78.3% # 5
Graph Classification IMDb-M TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 56.8% # 2
Graph Classification MUTAG TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 96.4% # 3
Graph Classification NCI1 TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 88.1% # 1
Graph Classification PROTEINS TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 82.9 # 3
Graph Classification PTC TFGW ADJ (L=2) Accuracy 72.4% # 11

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here