We expand on previous work for image quality assessment to provide two new analyses for assessing the discriminability and diversity of samples from class-conditional image synthesis models.
#6 best model for Conditional Image Generation on CIFAR-10
Automatically learned quality assessment for images has recently become a hot topic due to its usefulness in a wide variety of applications such as evaluating image capture pipelines, storage techniques and sharing media.
#4 best model for Aesthetics Quality Assessment on AVA
Our results show that networks trained to regress to the ground truth targets for labeled data and to simultaneously learn to rank unlabeled data obtain significantly better, state-of-the-art results for both IQA and crowd counting.
Furthermore, on the LIVE benchmark we show that our approach is superior to existing NR-IQA techniques and that we even outperform the state-of-the-art in full-reference IQA (FR-IQA) methods without having to resort to high-quality reference images to infer IQA.
We propose loss-variants and architecture-variants for classifying the most popular GANs, and discuss the potential improvements with focusing on these two aspects.
We present a deep neural network-based approach to image quality assessment (IQA).
To overcome those problems, we propose a new framework that produce imaginary videos by transformation generation.
Recognizing this, we propose a new representation of perceptual image quality, called probabilistic quality representation (PQR), to describe the image subjective score distribution, whereby a more robust loss function can be employed to train a deep BIQA model.
To guarantee a satisfying Quality of Experience (QoE) for consumers, it is required to measure image quality efficiently and reliably.
The proposed method, SFA, is compared with nine representative blur-specific NR-IQA methods, two general-purpose NR-IQA methods, and two extra full-reference IQA methods on Gaussian blur images (with and without Gaussian noise/JPEG compression) and realistic blur images from multiple databases, including LIVE, TID2008, TID2013, MLIVE1, MLIVE2, BID, and CLIVE.