Search Results for author:
Found 7 papers, 1 papers with code
Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation (full version)
In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-based semantics, where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics, where grades of acceptability are assigned to arguments.
Relevance in Structured Argumentation
Syntactic criteria have been proposed in the domain of relevance logic and were recently used in argumentation theory under the names of non-interference and crash-resistance.
Assumption-Based Approaches to Reasoning with Priorities
This paper maps out the relation between different approaches for handling preferences in argumentation with strict rules and defeasible assumptions by offering translations between them.
Reasoning by Cases in Structured Argumentation
We extend the $ASPIC^+$ framework for structured argumentation so as to allow applications of the reasoning by cases inference scheme for defeasible arguments.
An argumentative agent-based model of scientific inquiry
In this paper we present an agent-based model (ABM) of scientific inquiry aimed at investigating how different social networks impact the efficiency of scientists in acquiring knowledge.
A structured argumentation framework for detaching conditional obligations
We present a general formal argumentation system for dealing with the detachment of conditional obligations.
Relations between assumption-based approaches in nonmonotonic logic and formal argumentation
In this paper we make a contribution to the unification of formal models of defeasible reasoning.
