no code implementations • 31 Jul 2023 • Jesse Heyninck, Badran Raddaoui, Christian Straßer
In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-based semantics, where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics, where grades of acceptability are assigned to arguments.
no code implementations • 12 Jun 2023 • Jesse Heyninck, Ofer Arieli
This paper continues an established line of research about the relations between argumentation theory, particularly assumption-based argumentation, and different kinds of logic programs.
no code implementations • 18 May 2023 • Jesse Heyninck, Bart Bogaerts
Approximation fixpoint theory (AFT) is an abstract and general algebraic framework for studying the semantics of non-monotonic logics.
no code implementations • 30 Nov 2022 • Jesse Heyninck, Ofer Arieli, Bart Bogaerts
Approximation fixpoint theory (AFT) is an abstract and general algebraic framework for studying the semantics of nonmonotonic logics.
no code implementations • 9 May 2022 • Simon Marynissen, Jesse Heyninck, Bart Bogaerts, Marc Denecker
Justification theory is a general framework for the definition of semantics of rule-based languages that has a high explanatory potential.
no code implementations • 21 Sep 2017 • Jesse Heyninck, Christian Straßer, Pere Pardo
This paper maps out the relation between different approaches for handling preferences in argumentation with strict rules and defeasible assumptions by offering translations between them.
no code implementations • 24 Mar 2017 • Mathieu Beirlaen, Jesse Heyninck, Christian Straßer
We extend the $ASPIC^+$ framework for structured argumentation so as to allow applications of the reasoning by cases inference scheme for defeasible arguments.
no code implementations • 1 Apr 2016 • Jesse Heyninck, Christian Straßer
In this paper we make a contribution to the unification of formal models of defeasible reasoning.