Search Results for author:
Found 4 papers, 0 papers with code
A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of ASPIC+ and DeLP
Next, it is argued that there are reasons to consider a variant of DeLP with grounded semantics, since in some examples its current notion of warrant arguably has counterintuitive consequences and may lead to sets of warranted arguments that are not admissible.
An approach to Decision Making based on Dynamic Argumentation Systems
In this paper, we introduce a formalism for single-agent decision making that is based on Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks.
Bipolar in Temporal Argumentation Framework
A Timed Argumentation Framework (TAF) is a formalism where arguments are only valid for consideration in a given period of time, called availability intervals, which are defined for every individual argument.
An Approach to Characterize Graded Entailment of Arguments through a Label-based Framework
A classical argumentation process takes into account only the properties related to the intrinsic logical soundness of an argument in order to determine its acceptability status.
