Search Results for author: Mehrdad Sabetzadeh

Found 5 papers, 0 papers with code

Measuring Improvement of F$_1$-Scores in Detection of Self-Admitted Technical Debt

no code implementations16 Mar 2023 William Aiken, Paul K. Mvula, Paula Branco, Guy-Vincent Jourdan, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Herna Viktor

We find that our trained BERT model improves over the best performance of all previous methods in 19 of the 20 projects in cross-project scenarios.

Data Augmentation

TAPHSIR: Towards AnaPHoric Ambiguity Detection and ReSolution In Requirements

no code implementations21 Jun 2022 Saad Ezzini, Sallam Abualhaija, Chetan Arora, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh

We introduce TAPHSIR, a tool for anaphoric ambiguity detection and anaphora resolution in requirements.

Language Modelling

AI-enabled Automation for Completeness Checking of Privacy Policies

no code implementations10 Jun 2021 Orlando Amaral, Sallam Abualhaija, Damiano Torre, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel C. Briand

A prerequisite for GDPR compliance checking is to verify whether the content of a privacy policy is complete according to the provisions of GDPR.

On Systematically Building a Controlled Natural Language for Functional Requirements

no code implementations4 May 2020 Alvaro Veizaga, Mauricio Alferez, Damiano Torre, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel Briand

[Results] Our main contributions are: (1) a qualitative methodology to systematically define a CNL for functional requirements; this methodology is general and applicable to information systems beyond the financial domain, (2) a CNL grammar to represent functional requirements; this grammar is derived from our experience in the financial domain, but should be applicable, possibly with adaptations, to other information-system domains, and (3) an empirical evaluation of our CNL (Rimay) through an industrial case study.

An Automated Framework for the Extraction of Semantic Legal Metadata from Legal Texts

no code implementations30 Jan 2020 Amin Sleimi, Nicolas Sannier, Mehrdad Sabetzadeh, Lionel Briand, Marcello Ceci, John Dann

Our work is motivated by two observations: (1) the existing requirements engineering (RE) literature does not provide a harmonized view on the semantic metadata types that are useful for legal requirements analysis; (2) automated support for the extraction of semantic legal metadata is scarce, and it does not exploit the full potential of artificial intelligence technologies, notably natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML).

Software Engineering

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.