Search Results for author:
Found 3 papers, 0 papers with code
What's my role? Modelling responsibility for AI-based safety-critical systems
Many authors have commented on the "responsibility gap" where it is difficult for developers and manufacturers to be held responsible for harmful behaviour of an AI-SCS.
Unravelling Responsibility for AI
As part of a conscious effort towards 'unravelling' the concept of responsibility to support practical reasoning about responsibility for AI, this paper takes the three-part formulation, 'Actor A is responsible for Occurrence O' and identifies valid combinations of subcategories of A, is responsible for, and O.
A Principles-based Ethics Assurance Argument Pattern for AI and Autonomous Systems
An assurance case is a structured argument, typically produced by safety engineers, to communicate confidence that a critical or complex system, such as an aircraft, will be acceptably safe within its intended context.
