Detection Booster Training: A detection booster training method for improving the accuracy of classifiers.

1 Jan 2021  ·  Ali Ghobadzadeh, Deepak Sridhar, Juwei Lu, Wei Li ·

Deep learning models owe their success at large, to the availability of a large amount of annotated data. They try to extract features from the data that contain useful information needed to improve their performance on target applications. Most works focus on directly optimizing the target loss functions to improve the accuracy by allowing the model to implicitly learn representations from the data. There has not been much work on using background/noise data to estimate the statistics of in-domain data to improve the feature representation of deep neural networks. In this paper, we probe this direction by deriving a relationship between the estimation of unknown parameters of the probability density function (pdf) of input data and classification accuracy. Using this relationship, we show that having a better estimate of the unknown parameters using background and in-domain data provides better features which leads to better accuracy. Based on this result, we introduce a simple but effective detection booster training (DBT) method that applies a detection loss function on the early layers of a neural network to discriminate in-domain data points from noise/background data, to improve the classifier accuracy. The background/noise data comes from the same family of pdfs of input data but with different parameter sets (e.g., mean, variance). In addition, we also show that our proposed DBT method improves the accuracy even with limited labeled in-domain training samples as compared to normal training. We conduct experiments on face recognition, image classification, and speaker classification problems and show that our method achieves superior performance over strong baselines across various datasets and model architectures.

PDF Abstract

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here