Mutual Consistency Learning for Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation

21 Sep 2021  ·  Yicheng Wu, ZongYuan Ge, Donghao Zhang, Minfeng Xu, Lei Zhang, Yong Xia, Jianfei Cai ·

In this paper, we propose a novel mutual consistency network (MC-Net+) to effectively exploit the unlabeled data for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. The MC-Net+ model is motivated by the observation that deep models trained with limited annotations are prone to output highly uncertain and easily mis-classified predictions in the ambiguous regions (e.g., adhesive edges or thin branches) for medical image segmentation. Leveraging these challenging samples can make the semi-supervised segmentation model training more effective. Therefore, our proposed MC-Net+ model consists of two new designs. First, the model contains one shared encoder and multiple slightly different decoders (i.e., using different up-sampling strategies). The statistical discrepancy of multiple decoders' outputs is computed to denote the model's uncertainty, which indicates the unlabeled hard regions. Second, we apply a novel mutual consistency constraint between one decoder's probability output and other decoders' soft pseudo labels. In this way, we minimize the discrepancy of multiple outputs (i.e., the model uncertainty) during training and force the model to generate invariant results in such challenging regions, aiming at regularizing the model training. We compared the segmentation results of our MC-Net+ model with five state-of-the-art semi-supervised approaches on three public medical datasets. Extension experiments with two standard semi-supervised settings demonstrate the superior performance of our model over other methods, which sets a new state of the art for semi-supervised medical image segmentation. Our code is released publicly at https://github.com/ycwu1997/MC-Net.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here