Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation

CVPR 2015  ·  Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, Trevor Darrell ·

Convolutional networks are powerful visual models that yield hierarchies of features. We show that convolutional networks by themselves, trained end-to-end, pixels-to-pixels, exceed the state-of-the-art in semantic segmentation. Our key insight is to build "fully convolutional" networks that take input of arbitrary size and produce correspondingly-sized output with efficient inference and learning. We define and detail the space of fully convolutional networks, explain their application to spatially dense prediction tasks, and draw connections to prior models. We adapt contemporary classification networks (AlexNet, the VGG net, and GoogLeNet) into fully convolutional networks and transfer their learned representations by fine-tuning to the segmentation task. We then define a novel architecture that combines semantic information from a deep, coarse layer with appearance information from a shallow, fine layer to produce accurate and detailed segmentations. Our fully convolutional network achieves state-of-the-art segmentation of PASCAL VOC (20% relative improvement to 62.2% mean IU on 2012), NYUDv2, and SIFT Flow, while inference takes one third of a second for a typical image.

PDF Abstract CVPR 2015 PDF CVPR 2015 Abstract
Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Global Rank Uses Extra
Training Data
Result Benchmark
Semantic Segmentation ADE20K FCN Validation mIoU 29.39 # 221
Semantic Segmentation COCO-Stuff test FCN (VGG-16) mIoU 22.7% # 19
Semantic Segmentation Event-based Segmentation Dataset FCN mIoU 59.6 # 6
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL VOC 2012 test FCN (VGG-16) Mean IoU 62.2% # 49
Semantic Segmentation SELMA FCN mIoU 68.2 # 6
Semantic Segmentation SkyScapes-Dense FCN8s (ResNet-50) Mean IoU 33.06 # 3
Semantic Segmentation SkyScapes-Lane FCN8s (ResNet-50) Mean IoU 13.74 # 2
Semantic Segmentation Trans10K FCN mIoU 62.75% # 11
GFLOPs 42.23 # 8

Results from Other Papers


Task Dataset Model Metric Name Metric Value Rank Uses Extra
Training Data
Source Paper Compare
Optic Disc Segmentation Drishti-GS FCN DiceOC 0.8795 # 7
DiceOD 0.9569 # 7
mIoU 0.8392 # 6
Optic Disc Segmentation REFUGE FCN DiceOC 0.8467 # 6
DiceOD 92.56 # 7
mIoU 0.8247 # 4
Multi-tissue Nucleus Segmentation Kumar FCN8 (e) Dice 0.797 # 13
Hausdorff Distance (mm) 31.2 # 17
Semantic Segmentation PASCAL Context FCN-8s mIoU 37.8 # 60

Methods