Search Results for author: Jean-François Bonnefon

Found 5 papers, 0 papers with code

Lie detection algorithms attract few users but vastly increase accusation rates

no code implementations8 Dec 2022 Alicia von Schenk, Victor Klockmann, Jean-François Bonnefon, Iyad Rahwan, Nils Köbis

We find that the few people (33\%) who elect to use the algorithm drastically increase their accusation rates (from 25\% in the baseline condition up to 86% when the algorithm flags a statement as a lie).

Blaming humans in autonomous vehicle accidents: Shared responsibility across levels of automation

no code implementations19 Mar 2018 Edmond Awad, Sydney Levine, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Sohan Dsouza, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Azim Shariff, Jean-François Bonnefon, Iyad Rahwan

However, when both drivers make errors in cases of shared control between a human and a machine, the blame and responsibility attributed to the machine is reduced.

Cooperating with Machines

no code implementations17 Mar 2017 Jacob W. Crandall, Mayada Oudah, Tennom, Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko, Sherief Abdallah, Jean-François Bonnefon, Manuel Cebrian, Azim Shariff, Michael A. Goodrich, Iyad Rahwan

Here, we combine a state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithm with novel mechanisms for generating and acting on signals to produce a new learning algorithm that cooperates with people and other machines at levels that rival human cooperation in a variety of two-player repeated stochastic games.

Common Sense Reasoning Face Recognition

Experimental Assessment of Aggregation Principles in Argumentation-enabled Collective Intelligence

no code implementations3 Apr 2016 Edmond Awad, Jean-François Bonnefon, Martin Caminada, Thomas Malone, Iyad Rahwan

On the Web, there is always a need to aggregate opinions from the crowd (as in posts, social networks, forums, etc.).

On the Qualitative Comparison of Decisions Having Positive and Negative Features

no code implementations15 Jan 2014 Didier Dubois, Hélène Fargier, Jean-François Bonnefon

However, contraryto the latter framework that presupposes genuine numerical assessments, human agents often decide on the basis of an ordinal ranking of the pros and the cons, and by focusing on the most salient arguments.

Cannot find the paper you are looking for? You can Submit a new open access paper.