Search Results for author:
Found 13 papers, 1 papers with code
Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models
This work identifies 18 foundational challenges in assuring the alignment and safety of large language models (LLMs).
Responsible Reporting for Frontier AI Development
Mitigating the risks from frontier AI systems requires up-to-date and reliable information about those systems.
Visibility into AI Agents
Increased delegation of commercial, scientific, governmental, and personal activities to AI agents -- systems capable of pursuing complex goals with limited supervision -- may exacerbate existing societal risks and introduce new risks.
Towards Publicly Accountable Frontier LLMs: Building an External Scrutiny Ecosystem under the ASPIRE Framework
With the increasing integration of frontier large language models (LLMs) into society and the economy, decisions related to their training, deployment, and use have far-reaching implications.
Open-Sourcing Highly Capable Foundation Models: An evaluation of risks, benefits, and alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives
Recent decisions by leading AI labs to either open-source their models or to restrict access to their models has sparked debate about whether, and how, increasingly capable AI models should be shared.
Frontier AI Regulation: Managing Emerging Risks to Public Safety
To address these challenges, at least three building blocks for the regulation of frontier models are needed: (1) standard-setting processes to identify appropriate requirements for frontier AI developers, (2) registration and reporting requirements to provide regulators with visibility into frontier AI development processes, and (3) mechanisms to ensure compliance with safety standards for the development and deployment of frontier AI models.
Model evaluation for extreme risks
Current approaches to building general-purpose AI systems tend to produce systems with both beneficial and harmful capabilities.
Protecting Society from AI Misuse: When are Restrictions on Capabilities Warranted?
We also contend that some restrictions on non-AI capabilities needed to cause harm will be required.
The Brussels Effect and Artificial Intelligence: How EU regulation will impact the global AI market
We consider both the possibility that the EU's AI regulation will incentivise changes in products offered in non-EU countries (a de facto Brussels Effect) and the possibility it will influence regulation adopted by other jurisdictions (a de jure Brussels Effect).
Filling gaps in trustworthy development of AI
The range of application of artificial intelligence (AI) is vast, as is the potential for harm.
Institutionalising Ethics in AI through Broader Impact Requirements
In 2020, the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) introduced a requirement for submitting authors to include a statement on the broader societal impacts of their research.
Toward Trustworthy AI Development: Mechanisms for Supporting Verifiable Claims
With the recent wave of progress in artificial intelligence (AI) has come a growing awareness of the large-scale impacts of AI systems, and recognition that existing regulations and norms in industry and academia are insufficient to ensure responsible AI development.
Computers and Society
Social and Governance Implications of Improved Data Efficiency
Many researchers work on improving the data efficiency of machine learning.
