Generating Data Augmentation samples for Semantic Segmentation of Salt Bodies in a Synthetic Seismic Image Dataset

Nowadays, subsurface salt body localization and delineation, also called semantic segmentation of salt bodies, are among the most challenging geophysicist tasks. Thus, identifying large salt bodies is notoriously tricky and is crucial for identifying hydrocarbon reservoirs and drill path planning. This work proposes a Data Augmentation method based on training two generative models to augment the number of samples in a seismic image dataset for the semantic segmentation of salt bodies. Our method uses deep learning models to generate pairs of seismic image patches and their respective salt masks for the Data Augmentation. The first model is a Variational Autoencoder and is responsible for generating patches of salt body masks. The second is a Conditional Normalizing Flow model, which receives the generated masks as inputs and generates the associated seismic image patches. We evaluate the proposed method by comparing the performance of ten distinct state-of-the-art models for semantic segmentation, trained with and without the generated augmentations, in a dataset from two synthetic seismic images. The proposed methodology yields an average improvement of 8.57% in the IoU metric across all compared models. The best result is achieved by a DeeplabV3+ model variant, which presents an IoU score of 95.17% when trained with our augmentations. Additionally, our proposal outperformed six selected data augmentation methods, and the most significant improvement in the comparison, of 9.77%, is achieved by composing our DA with augmentations from an elastic transformation. At last, we show that the proposed method is adaptable for a larger context size by achieving results comparable to the obtained on the smaller context size.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


  Add Datasets introduced or used in this paper

Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods