no code implementations • 22 Dec 2023 • Norman Zerbe, Lars Ole Schwen, Christian Geißler, Katja Wiesemann, Tom Bisson, Peter Boor, Rita Carvalho, Michael Franz, Christoph Jansen, Tim-Rasmus Kiehl, Björn Lindequist, Nora Charlotte Pohlan, Sarah Schmell, Klaus Strohmenger, Falk Zakrzewski, Markus Plass, Michael Takla, Tobias Küster, André Homeyer, Peter Hufnagl
Over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) methods in pathology have advanced substantially.
1 code implementation • 20 Dec 2023 • Hannah Blocher, Georg Schollmeyer, Malte Nalenz, Christoph Jansen
We propose a framework for descriptively analyzing sets of partial orders based on the concept of depth functions.
1 code implementation • 22 Jun 2023 • Christoph Jansen, Georg Schollmeyer, Hannah Blocher, Julian Rodemann, Thomas Augustin
Spaces with locally varying scale of measurement, like multidimensional structures with differently scaled dimensions, are pretty common in statistics and machine learning.
1 code implementation • 19 Apr 2023 • Hannah Blocher, Georg Schollmeyer, Christoph Jansen, Malte Nalenz
We propose a framework for descriptively analyzing sets of partial orders based on the concept of depth functions.
1 code implementation • 2 Mar 2023 • Julian Rodemann, Christoph Jansen, Georg Schollmeyer, Thomas Augustin
As a practical proof of concept, we spotlight the application of three of our robust extensions on simulated and real-world data.
no code implementations • 13 Dec 2022 • Christoph Jansen, Georg Schollmeyer, Thomas Augustin
The quality of consequences in a decision making problem under (severe) uncertainty must often be compared among different targets (goals, objectives) simultaneously.
no code implementations • 5 Sep 2022 • Christoph Jansen, Malte Nalenz, Georg Schollmeyer, Thomas Augustin
This yields indeed a powerful framework for the statistical comparison of classifiers over multiple data sets with respect to multiple quality criteria simultaneously.
no code implementations • 19 Oct 2021 • Christoph Jansen, Hannah Blocher, Thomas Augustin, Georg Schollmeyer
The first approach directly utilizes the collected ranking data for obtaining the ordinal part of the preferences, while their cardinal part is constructed implicitly by measuring meta data on the decision maker's consideration times.